2009 UT App 382 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Larsen · West v. Thomson Newspapers · State v. Harmon · State v. S.H. · Gohler v. Wood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Clourts should avoid reaching constitutional issues if the case can be decided on other grounds.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale, or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly to: (1) employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (2) make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the cireumstances under which they are made, not misleading; or (3) engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the witness's legal conclusions blur the separate and distinct responsibilities of the judge, jury and witness, or there is danger that a juror may turn to the [witness's legal conclusion] rather than the judge for guidance on the applicable law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.