Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT App 397 - State v. Richards

2009 UT App 397 - State v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Arvizu · Ansari v. Pahlavi · United States v. Wood · State v. Sery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The possession of open maps and the vestiges of fast-food meals describes a very large category of presumably innocent travelers, and any suspicion associated with these items is virtually nonexistent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Aln officer is not required to rule out all innocent behavior in order for reasonable suspicion to arise....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “rule out the possibility of innocent conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.