Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT App 51 - State v. Perry

2009 UT App 51 - State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Kimmelman v. Morrison · Glover v. United States · State v. Litherland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An ineffective assistance of counsel claim raised for the first time on appeal presents a question of law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “that counsel's performance was deficient”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “counsel's errors 'actually had an adverse effect on the defense' and that 'there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.