Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 UT App 73 - State v. Dominguez

2009 UT App 73 - State v. Dominguez’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Leon · United States v. Leake · United States v. Stefanson · Ostler v. Buhler · State v. Anderton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “after issuing a warrant, the issuing magistrate return[ed] both the warrant and the supporting material to the law enforcement officer seeking the warrant. After the warrant [was] executed, the officer deliver[ed] the original warrant, the supporting material, the return, and the inventory of items seized in the search to the magistrate, who then review[ed] it and either file[d] it with the court or return[ed] it to law enforcement with a request that law enforcement file it with the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]t the time of issuance, . . . [to] retain and seal a copy of the search warrant, the application and all affidavits or other recorded testimony on which the warrant [was] based.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it is not sufficient for the peace officer alone to retain this information and subsequently supply it to the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.