Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 VT 11 - Follo v. Florindo

Follo v. Florindo’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

4 district · 63 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-Jenkins (2010), DeLeonardis v. Page (2010)

4 district · 63 state decisions

440200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brueckner v. Norwich University · Earl v. Bouchard Transportation Co. · Lent v. Huntoon · Poplaski v. Lamphere · Monahan v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to prove fraud, plaintiffs must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence each of the following essential elements. One, that defendants misrepresented an existing fact which affected the essence of the transaction with plaintiffs or knowingly allowed another to make such a representation on defendants’ behalf; two, that defendants did so intentionally; three, that the misrepresentation was false when made and known at the time to be false by a defendant, or that the representation was recklessly made as being within the defendants’ own knowledge without defendant in fact knowing whether it was true or not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In general, issues not raised at trial are unpreserved, and this Court will not review them on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.