State v. Sole’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably State v. Therrien, Jr. (2011), State v. Pitts (2009)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · Bumper v. North Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“preservation rule exists so that the trial court can address any correctable errors before they are presented here, and develop an adequate record for any appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[d]efendant's argument [was] unpreserved because ... [he] did not raise this particular issue in a manner requiring a ruling by the district court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Arguments that are neither litigated nor decided below will not be addressed for the first time on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.