Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 WI 14 - State v. Kramer

State v. Kramer’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
12
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

92 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably 239 Ill. 2d 260 - People v. McDonough (2010), State v. Dearborn (2010)

92 state decisions — followed in 12 states

760200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Whren v. United States · Adams v. Williams · Delaware v. Prouse · Pennsylvania v. Mimms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the degree of the public interest and the exigency of the situation; (2) the attendant circumstances surrounding the seizure, including time, location, the degree of overt authority and force displayed; (3) whether an automobile is involved; and (4) the availability, feasibility and effectiveness of alternatives to the type of intrusion actually accomplished.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “balancing a public interest or need that is furthered by the officer's conduct against the degree of and nature of the restriction upon the liberty interest of the citizen.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.