Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 WI 21 - State v. Ndina

State v. Ndina’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

172
cited by 172 later decisions
5
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

171 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 172 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 2009 WI App 62 - Industrial Risk Insurers & Quad Graphics, Inc. v. American Engineering Testing, Inc. (2009), Robinson v. State (2009)

171 state decisions

1220200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · Neder v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 172 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whereas forfeiture is the failure to make the timely assertion of a right, waiver is the intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.”
    38 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “rule is to enable the circuit court to avoid or correct any error with minimal disruption of the judicial process, eliminating the need for appeal. The forfeiture rule also gives both parties and the circuit court notice of the issue and a fair opportunity to address the objection; encourages attorneys to diligently prepare for and conduct trials; and prevents attorneys from”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) to ensure a fair trial; (2) to remind the prosecutor and judge of their responsibility to the accused and the importance of their functions; (3) to encourage witnesses to come forward; and (4) to discourage perjury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.