State v. Goodson’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

cited by 28 later decisions

states following

July 2020

most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · State v. Washington · 83 Wis. 2d 808 - State v. Washington · State v. Brown · 165 Wis. 2d 373 - State v. Rochelt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“not to hold the balance nice, clear and true.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 267 - Miller v. Carroll (In re Paternity B.J.M.) · 384 Wis. 2d 414 - State v. Lamb
“Goodson filed a motion for postconviction relief, arguing that he had been deprived of the right to an impartial judge because the court prejudged the reconfinement sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 352 - State v. Driver
“Thus, actual bias — either its presence, or the great risk of it — is the underlying concern of objective bias [due process] analysis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. State v. Jesse L. Herrmann

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.