State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited
24 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. United States · Texas v. New Mexico · Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Garay · 92 Wis. 2d 797 - State v. MacHner · 113 Wis. 2d 61 - Sweet v. Berge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel does not automatically trigger a right to a [postconviction] testimonial hearing.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“[N]o hearing is required if the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his or her motion, if the defendant presents only conclusory allegations or subjective opinions, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that he or she is not entitled to relief.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Robinson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.