State v. Jaramillo’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “We have previously noted that we do "not possess any supervisory authority which would permit [us] to promulgate rules of criminal practice and procedure.". . . Bather, "Wisconsin's constitution and statutes limit such a law-developing or law-declaring function exclusively to the Wisconsin Supreme Court." Our constitution gives the supreme court supervisory authority over all of the courts of this state, but delegates such authority to the court of appeals only over "the courts in the district." A mandate that all courts in Wisconsin must conduct a colloquy to ensure a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives the right not to testify must therefore come from the supreme court. Although we cannot require a colloquy, we do recommend it as good practice.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 335 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Denson

2. “the constitutionally articulated corollary to the right to testify — the right not to testify — is fundamental as well.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 335 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Denson

3. “No person ... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. . . .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 335 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Denson