Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 WY 23 - Schmidt v. Killmer

Schmidt v. Killmer’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 2020

5 state decisions

30200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 118 Ill. App. 3d 455 - McCormick v. McCormick · Laird v. Laird · 228 Wis. 2d 250 - Hallin v. Hallin · Platt v. Creighton · First State Bank of Wheatland v. American National Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One who signs a contract generally cannot avoid it on the ground that he did not attend to its terms, or did not read it, or supposed that it was different in its terms, or that he took someone's word as to what it contained.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.