Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2009 WY 89 - Creecy v. State

Creecy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2024

10 state decisions

70200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Granzer v. State · State v. Flory · Farmer v. State · Small v. State · Garcia v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(n-structions must be considered as a whole, and individual instructions, or parts of them, should not be singled out and considered in isolation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[The Defendant was justified in using deadly force to repel the danger only if he retreated as far as he safely could do before using deadly force. The law requires a person to retreat rather than to take the life of an adversary if there was a convenient mode of retreat without increasing his actual or apparent peril.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “To justify acting in self-defense, it is not necessary that the danger was real, or that the danger was impending and immediate, so long as the defendant had reasonable cause to believe and did believe these facts. If these two requirements are met, acting in self-defense is justified even though there is no intention on the part of the other person to do the defendant harm, nor any impending and immediate danger, nor the actual necessity for acting in self-defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.