¶1
¶2 It is so ordered.
201 Ala. 499
78 So 853
Decided May 9, 1918
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1918-05-09
<p>1. Adoption <&wkey;16 — -Restoration oe Adopted Child.</p> <p>In a bill to restore an adopted child to its natural parents, the court, having due regard for that parental love which covers a multitude of shortcomings, is clothed with a sound discretion to grant such relief as the best interests of the child.may demand.</p> <p>2. Adoption <&wkey;16 ■ — Restoration — Discretion oe Court.</p> <p>Although a child has been adopted by proceedings in probate court under Code 1907, § 5202, a court of equity, its jurisdiction being properly invoked, exercises a free discretion in disposing of the child for its own benefit and welfare.</p> <p>3. Adoption <&wkey;16 — Restoration—Consent oe Parents.</p> <p>In bill for restoration of a child to its natural parents, adoption proceedings had by consent and request of the parents is not without weighty consideration.</p>
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“sound discretion to grant or refuse relief [from a consent to adoption] as the best interests of the infant may demand”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 864 So. 2d 333 - Klb v. Wmf
Relies on Murphree v. Hanson · Kirkbride v. Harvey
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1918-05-09
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2002
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1
¶2 It is so ordered.