Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 Ala. 574 - Ford v. Strong

Ford v. Strong’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 1929
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hollis v. Watkins · Clements v. Faulk & Co. · Snead v. Scott · Lanford v. Lee · Kelley v. Kelley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It was the evident intent of the statute to stabilize not only the title' (with the exception provided in the statute), but also the use, enjoyment, and occupancy of the homestead during the period stipulated therein, viz. the life of the' widow and the minority of the child or children. None of those in whom the exemption becomes vested can lawfully exclude another of them from the occupation of the premises, or lawfully deny to a coexemptioner, rcsidkiff on the premises [italics supplied], the benefit of rents, incomes, and profits of or from tho premises.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.