State v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Jones v. United States · State v. Bible · State v. Gendron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This case requires us to apply the rule we expressed in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000): "Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Henderson“sentencing process was fundamentally flawed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Munninger
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.