Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 Ark. 63 - Krickerberg v. Hoff

Krickerberg v. Hoff’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
April 2004
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably 56 Ark. App. 71 - Jamison v. Estate of Goodlett (1997), Monroe v. Monroe (1956)

26 state decisions

801940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lowe v. Hart · Stifft v. W. B. Worthen Co. · Carter v. Greenway · Hunter v. State · Fullerton v. Storthz Brothers Inv. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Our statute, § 8091, C. & M. Digest, provides: ‘Any person desiring a division of land lield in joint tenancy, in common or in coparceny, shall file in the circuit court a written petition,’ etc. Appellee did not claim to hold in joint tenancy, in common, or in coparceny. The complaint did not state a cause of action for partition, as it failed to allege such an interest in the land as would justify partition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The term “cotenancy” refers to the ownership of property by two or more persons in such manner that they have an undivided possession or right to possession ... The right of each cotenant to possession is the primary essential element of all cotenancies. [Emphasis supplied] 20 Am. Jur. 2d, Cotenancy and Joint Ownership, § 1, p. 92.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.