Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 CONN 489 - State v. Crump

State v. Crump’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

107
cited by 107 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

107 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably State v. Williams (1987), State v. Baldwin (1993)

107 state decisions

5601986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Johnson v. Zerbst · Pinkerton v. United States · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Mullaney v. Wilbur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the defendant or his companion actually pushed [the robbery victim] away from the open cash register and took the $300 from it. It is not required that the proof show that the defendant was the actual perpetrator because the proof does show that the perpetrator [was] aided by another person actually present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A person, acting with the mental state required for commission of an offense, who . . . intentionally aids another person to engage in conduct which constitutes an offense shall be criminally liable for such conduct and may be prosecuted and punished as if he were the principal offender.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The trier of the facts determinates with finality the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be accorded to their testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.