State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
96 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably State v. Golding (1989), Connecticut National Bank v. Douglas (1992)
96 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · State v. Evans · First National City Bank v. Banco Nacional de Cuba · Kelly v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“control is not the manifestation of an act of control but instead it is the act of being in a position of control coupled with the requisite mental intent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[t]o possess, according to § 53a-3 (2), is to have actual physical possession or otherwise to exercise dominion or control ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“appears the legislature intended to restrict the scope of this provision to Title 53a only.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.