State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
103 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 103 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably State v. Miller (1987), State v. Walton (1993)
103 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Green v. United States · Harris v. New York · Minnesota v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[T]he [ Fifth ] Amendment speaks of compulsion. It does not preclude a witness from testifying voluntarily in matters which may incriminate him. If, therefore, he desires the protection of the privilege, he must claim it or he will not be considered to have been”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The judicial authority may, upon his own motion or the motion of any party, order that two or more indictments or informations or both, whether against the same defendant or different defendants, be tried together.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Walton“within the meaning of the Amendment. United States v. Monia , [ 317 U.S. 424 , 427 (1943)] (footnote omitted).'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.