Roschynialski v. Hale’s Empirical Analysis
201 F. 1017 · 1913
Citation profile
5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1954
5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Parker v. . Marco · Greer v. Young · Atchison v. Morris · Bridges v. Sheldon · Kauffman v. Kennedy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is to secure to them the right to give testimony and assistance in the trial of an action, unhindered by exposure to suits by reason of their presence upon the court. The rule is founded in public policy, and is for the benefit of the court, as well as of the parties.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stratton v. Hughes
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.