In re Lipman’s Empirical Analysis
201 F. 169 · 1912
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1942
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Murphy v. John Hofman Co. · Bryan v. Louis Bernheimer · Whitney v. Wenman · In re Rochford · Fidelity Trust Co. v. Gaskell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When such property (property which had been transferred by bankrupt within four months before the institution of proceedings under such circumstances as suggested the probability of an effort to defraud creditors) is obtained, whether willingly or reluctantly yielded, it is in the possession of the court exercising such ancillary jurisdiction, and that court, Toy its very possession, draws to Itself tlie power to determine tiie interests therein of all parties making claim thereto, and it becomes its duty to so determine and grant complete relief, that further litigation in regard thereto may be avoided.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Dialogue
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.