Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 F.2d 195 - Pang-Tsu Mow v. Republic of China

Pang-Tsu Mow v. Republic of China’s Empirical Analysis

201 F.2d 195 · 1952

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
7
states following
December 2006
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently December 2006 · most notably Sullivan v. Murphy (1973), James R. Nestor v. Lewis B. Hershey (1969)

42 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions

220195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 4

Relies on United States v. Sherwood · Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. · Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp. · National Mut Ins Co of District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Co Inc · O'Donoghue v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This statute explicitly authorizes an appeal from such an interlocutory order, and we do not think a determination and direction under Rule 54(b) is a condition thereto even though the suit involves multiple claims. The Rule is designed to preclude appeal until there is finality. The statutory provision for appeal from an interlocutory order involving an injunction is an exception to the necessity for finality. Reconciliation of the Rule with the statute requires that the former be not construed so as to supplant the exception. 91 U.S.App.D.C. at 326, 201 F.2d at 197 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.