Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

201 F.2d 202

Docket No. 11381.

Morgan v. Santucci

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-12-11

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1952

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Moore v. Snider · Stein v. Treger · Lester v. Superior Motor Car, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-12-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1John T. Bonner, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Harry L. Ryan, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellees.

¶3Before CLARK, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM. ■

¶5This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, imposing damages upon the appellant, the seller of certain real property, in a suit by the purchasers for breach of contract and misrepresentation. Appellant’s assignments of error with respect to the content of the trial court’s instructions to the jury appear to us to be without merit: the charge taken as a whole was a fair and adequate statement of the applicable law, as found in Lester v. Superior Motor Car Co., 1941, 73 App.D.C. 171, 117 F.2d 780. See also Darnell v. Darnell, 91 U.S.App.D.C. -, 200 F.2d 747; Stein v. Treger, 1950, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 400, 182 F.2d 696. The jury’s verdict was based on sufficient evidence. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be

¶6Affirmed.

/201/f2d/202 · .json · Public domain