Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

201 F.2d 363

Docket No. 10959.

Mestice v. McShea

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 19, 1953.

Decided Jan. 23, 1953.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1953-01-23

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1953-01-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 1991

7 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

6019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William R. Mestice, pro se.

¶2Robert Scherling, Newark, N. J., for appellees.

¶3*364Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant seeks review of an order dismissing with prejudice his petition for relief from a state court judgment. He asks removal of the proceedings to a federal court and an injunction against the judgment. It is unnecessary to go into, the history or merits of the litigation. Suffice it to say that there are no proceedings to remove here. The state litigation terminated in a judgment which is now final. It is, therefore, res judicata. This court has no authority, to sit in review of that judgment.

¶6The order dismissing the' petition will be affirmed.

/201/f2d/363 · .json · Public domain