Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 22, 1953.

Decided Feb. 6, 1953.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1953-02-06

Relies on Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1953-02-06

¶1Harry Price, New York City (Stoneciptier & Cunningham, by Charles L. Cunningham, Pittsburgh, Pa., Matthew Sidney Birón, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Harold S. Ackerman and Hook & Ackerman, Inc.

¶2William B. Jaspert, Pittsburgh, Pa., for C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, ind. and d/b/a Hook & Miller; and R. O. Graffius.

¶3Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Points presented in this appeal were all discussed in the opihion of Judge Stewart in the district court. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc., D.C.W.D.Pa.1952, 103 F.Supp. 790. We think that he was right and affirm for the reasons set out in his opinion.

¶6The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.