Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

201 F.2d 707

Docket No. 11502.

Wunderle v. Kimball

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Dec. 16, 1952.

Decided Dec. 31, 1952.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1952-12-31

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1962

7 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Grasse v. Snyder · Baxter v. Pace

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1952-12-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Keith L. Seegmiller, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Frank H. Strickler, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., and Joseph M. Howard and Frederick G. Smithson, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee. William E. Kirk, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., entered his appearance for appellee.

¶3Before EDGERTON, PRETTYMAN and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Appellant was removed from employment in the classified civil service of the United States on July 11, 1941. At her request she was furnished a brief statement which purported to inform her of the reasons for her removal. Repeatedly thereafter she wrote various officials in the Navy Department, seeking reinstatement. On October 12, 1942, she was advised by the Assistant Secretary that the entire file had been reviewed and no reason found to warrant a change in the action taken. She continued, by letters addressed to various officials in the Navy Department and other officials, to seek reinstatement. She filed the present action January 23, 1952. The District Court was of opinion, upon the authority of Grasse v. Snyder,1 that the action was barred by laches. We agree with that conclusion.

¶6Affirmed.

/201/f2d/707 · .json · Public domain