Watson v. Pace

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Jan. 8, 1953.

Decided Jan. 22, 1953.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1953-01-22

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently June 1973

5 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Watson v. Pace

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1953-01-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Claude L. Dawson, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

¶2Joseph Kovner, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., with whom Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., and Edward H. Hickey, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. G, were on the brief, for appellee. William R. Glendon, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. G, entered his appearance for appellee. Joseph M. How*714ard, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., when the brief was filed, entered his appearance for appellee.

¶3Before EDGERTON, PROCTOR, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the District Court. Watson v. Pace, 101 F.Supp. 477.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Henry White Edgerton
Chief Judge
GW
George Thomas Washington
Circuit Judge
James McPherson Proctor
Circuit Judge
PER CURIAM.
By the court
Read opinion →

Counsel

Claude L. Dawson, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Joseph Kovner, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., with whom Charles M. Irelan, U. S. Atty., and Edward H. Hickey, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. G, were on the brief, for appellee. William R. Glendon, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. G, entered his appearance for appellee. Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., when the brief was filed, entered his appearance for appellee.