Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 F.3d 116 - United States v. Bayless

United States v. Bayless’s Empirical Analysis

201 F.3d 116 · 2000

Citation profile

158
cited by 158 later decisions
4
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

53 federal appellate · 10 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 158 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably United States v. Yousef (2003), Taylor v. Vermont Department of Education (2002)

53 federal appellate · 10 district · 4 state decisions

900200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Terry v. Ohio · United States v. Olano · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Cortez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 158 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonable and cautious police officer on the scene, guided by his experience and training,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Disqualification is not required on the basis of remote, contingent, indirect or speculative interests.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ or deviation from a legal rule which has not been waived. Second, the error must be ”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.