Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 F.3d 1212 - Anthony Rutledge Afl Hotel and Restaurant Workers' Health and Welfare Order and Amended v. Seyfarth Shaw Fairweather & Geraldson Mitchell Whitehead Opinion

Anthony Rutledge Afl Hotel and Restaurant Workers' Health and Welfare Order and Amended v. Seyfarth Shaw Fairweather & Geraldson Mitchell Whitehead Opinion’s Empirical Analysis

201 F.3d 1212 · 2000

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. · Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fulfill[] the statutory mandate of broad preemption without intruding upon state laws beyond the intention of Congress and the objectives of ERISA”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[S]tate laws that: (1) mandate employee benefit structures or their administration; (2) bind employers or plan administrators to particular choices or preclude uniform administrative practice; and (3) provide alternative enforcement mechanisms to obtain ERISA plan benefits.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “look both to the `objectives of the [FEHBA] statute as a guide to the scope of the state law that Congress understood would survive,' as well as to the nature of the effect of the state law on[FEHBA] plans.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.