Autoridad De Energ Electrica De Puerto Rico v. Ericsson Inc’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 20 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Triple Quest, Inc. v. Cleveland Gear Co. (2001), Boland v. George S. May International Co. (2012)
1 federal appellate · 20 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Quackenbush California Insurance Commissioner v. Allstate Insurance Co · Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer · Lambert v. Kysar · Foster v. Chesapeake Insurance · McDermott International, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters of London
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. (emphasis in original). In other words, a forum-selection clause specifying that the parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of a particular court does no more than signify the parties'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an affirmative conferral of personal jurisdiction by consent, and not a negative exclusion of jurisdiction in other courts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“an obvious interest in cutting off any possible 4 By contrast, in Centro Médico, we found that a forum-selection clause similar to the Ericsson clause was mandatory because it, unlike the Ericsson clause, reflected an agreement by putative plaintiffs to file their complaints in a particular court. - 16 - litigation on personal jurisdiction grounds, even if the issue [i]s unlikely to be raised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.