Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 F.3d 473 - In Re Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr. (Seligman Fee Application)

In Re Samuel R. PIERCE, Jr. (Seligman Fee Application)’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
July 2006
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California · Olson v. 86-1 · In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application) · In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application) · In re Sealed Case

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As both the IC and the DOJ argue, the allegations here of obstruction of justice and perjury would have been investigated with or without the Independent Counsel statute. Conclusion 15 The petition of Patsy Thomasson for reimbursement of attorneys' fees is denied for failure to satisfy the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.