Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 F.3d 521 - Tyrone Andrews v. J. M. Daw, in His Individual Capacity

Tyrone Andrews v. J. M. Daw, in His Individual Capacity’s Empirical Analysis

201 F.3d 521 · 2000

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
3
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 17 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Davani v. Virginia Department of Transportation (2006), Kirkhart v. Keiper (2004)

8 federal appellate · 17 district · 3 state decisions

420200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kentucky v. Graham · Montana v. United States · Breard v. Greene · Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Matkari · In re Turner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] court may take judicial notice of facts from a prior judicial proceeding when the res judicata defense raises no disputed issue of fact.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] party appearing in an action in one capacity, individual or representative, is not thereby bound by or entitled to the benefits of the rules of res judicata in a subsequent action in which he appears in another capacity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Our cases have been unclear on whether a dismissal on Eleventh Amendment immunity grounds is a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) or a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.