Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 F.3d 651 - Danny Lewis Hatchet v. Unknown Nettles

Danny Lewis Hatchet v. Unknown Nettles’s Empirical Analysis

201 F.3d 651 · 2000

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence Agency (2004), Elmore v. Henderson (2000)

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

250200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owens v. Okure · McGore v. Wrigglesworth · Harrelson v. United States · Henderson v. Norris · Long v. Simmons

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If it appears that the prisoner has not complied with the district court’s initial partial filing fee order within the applicable time period, the district court should take reasonable steps to ascertain whether the prisoner has complied with the order by allowing objections to a magistrate judge’s report, issuing a show-cause order, communicating .... with officials of the custodial institution, issuing an order to the custodial institution, or using any other method designed to obtain the relevant information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he district court should take reasonable steps to ascertain whether the prisoner has complied with the order by allowing objections to a magistrate judge's report, issuing a show-cause order, communicating by telephone, fax, or e-mail with officials of the custodial institution, issuing an order to the custodial institution, or using any other method designed to obtain the relevant information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.