Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 F.3d 774 - In Re: Sami Yousif

In Re: Sami Yousif’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2009
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Catlin v. United States · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey · Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis · Lombard v. Marcera · Holder v. Hall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. In the absence of such determination and direction, any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties, and the order or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “view all proceedings in this action, whether in the Bankruptcy Court or the District Court, as one proceeding in bankruptcy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The court's decision in Gardner is directly analogous to the present case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.