Brenner v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 2002
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Relies on Tennessee v. Davis · Maryland v. Soper · Gay v. Ruff · Mandelbaum v. United States · 143 F. Supp. 445 - State of Oklahoma v. Willingham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * * ffi * * “(3) Any officer of the courts of the United States, for any Act under color of office or in the performance of his duties”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McGlasson v. Barger · Arthur v. Fry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.