Marks v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

cited by 2 later decisions

May 2018

most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 301 (§ 1 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co. · Garner v. Heckler · Allen v. Califano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“involves lifting no more than 10 pounds at a time and occasionally lifting or carrying articles like docket files, ledgers, and small tools. Although a sedentary job is defined as one which involves sitting, a certain amount of walking and standing is often necessary in carrying out job duties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Schumpert v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“[o]nly if ... the ALJ does not give controlling weight to the treating physician's opinion is the opinion subjected to another analysis based on the particulars of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Schumpert v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
“requires a good deal of walking or standing, or ... sitting most of the time with some pushing and pulling of arm or leg controls.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Schumpert v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.