201 Ga. App. 749 - Jacobson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably 224 Ga. App. 656 - Brewer v. State (1997), 222 Ga. App. 704 - Elrod v. State (1996)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · 198 Ga. App. 503 - Harris v. State · Johnson v. State · 188 Ga. App. 496 - Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The bench mark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel’s conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result. In order to prevail on an ineffectiveness claim, a convicted defendant must show (1) that counsel’s performance was deficient, i.e., that counsel’s performance was not reasonable under all the circumstances, and (2) that this deficient performance prejudiced the defense, i.e., that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. The complaining defendant must make both showings.’ (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Richardson v. State, 194 Ga. App. 358, 358-359 ( 390 SE2d 442 ) (1990).” Jacobson v. State, 201 Ga. App. 749, 752 (5) ( 412 SE2d 859 ) (1991); Spivey v. State, 193 Ga. App. 127, 130 (3) ( 386 SE2d 868 ) (1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Objections not raised at trial cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.