201 Ill. App. 3d 963 - Haley v. Posdal’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 104 Ill. 2d 317 - Rakowski v. Lucente · 57 Ill. 2d 330 - Glidden v. Farmers Automobile Insurance · 101 Ill. 2d 196 - Alsup v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. · 137 Ill. App. 3d 294 - Beauvoir v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center · 107 Ill. App. 3d 435 - Ainsworth Corp. v. Cenco, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“" 'The undersigned hereby assigns, transfers and sets over to [the insurer] any and all claim or causes of action for bodily injury which the undersigned now has, or may hereafter have, to recover against any person or persons as the result of said accident and loss above stated to the extent of the payment made above ***.’ ” (Emphasis added.) Haley, 201 Ill. App. 3d at 966 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where the language in the release 'assigns’ the claim or cause of action to the insurer without the necessity of recovery, an assignment rather than a subrogation exists.” Haley, 201 Ill. App. 3d at 968 . It found”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.