Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 Ind. 249 - Hoag v. Jeffers

Hoag v. Jeffers’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Cantwell v. Cantwell (1957), 152 Ind. App. 665 - Kreczmer v. Allied Construction Company (1972)

34 state decisions

801928193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Poetker · Rooker v. Bruce · Woodard v. Killen · Buck v. Havens · Ervin School Township v. Tapp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is the function of the trial court to decide the question whether or not the default judgment in the particular case must be set aside, which action requires it to determine the sufficiency of the evidence which bears upon the question of the mistake, inadvertance, surprise or excusable neglect of the plaintiff. . . . “A judgment by default, regular upon its face, is presumed to be clothed with the presumption that it was properly entered, when the record does not show anything inconsistent with such presumption. . . . “If there be any evidence to support the finding upon the issue of fact to set aside the default and the judgment by default, upon appeal, the finding will be sustained.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.