Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 Kan. 705 - Hess v. Jarboe

Hess v. Jarboe’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
April 1995
most recently cited

2 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently April 1995 · most notably Spencer v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance (1980), Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Cinderella Homes, Inc. (1979)

2 district · 32 state decisions

2201968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Watkins v. Layton · Will v. Hughes · Motor Equipment Co. v. McLaughlin · Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance · Walker v. Fleming Motor Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An exception to this general rule is recognized when some independent tort or wrong results in additional injury which justifies the assessment of punitive damages by way of punishment of the wrongdoer. In such a case the proof of the independent tort must indicate the presence of malice, fraud or wanton disregard for the rights of others.” (p. 709.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(p. 336). As to appellant's claim for punitive damages, it is clear that such damages are not recoverable for breach of contract in the absence of an independent tort connected therewith.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] party may recover punitive damages [for breach of contract] when some independent tort results in additional injury and such tortious act indicates malice, fraud or wanton disregard for the rights of others.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.