Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 La. 192 - State v. Duhe

State v. Duhe’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2002

10 state decisions

401942195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Saunders v. Busch-Everett Co. · Leonard v. Busch-Everett Co. · Martel v. Jennings-Heywood Oil Syndicate · Henderson v. City of Shreveport · Cali v. National Linen Service Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fiscal affairs of the state, the possession, control, administration, and disposition of the property, funds, and revenues of the state, are matters appertaining exclusively to the legislative department.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`Since, in the case at bar, the Attorney General does not question the constitutionality of Act No. 279 of 1926 and since he concedes that the act of the agent of the state was not tainted with fraud or that he abused the discretion or authority reposed in him by the Legislature, it seems plain that judicial interference would be unwarranted under such circumstances. The Legislature, where unrestrained by constitutional prohibition, has plenary power to convey the property of the State on such terms and conditions as in its wisdom it sees fit to impose and the remedies provided by the Civil Code for the rescission of sales on account of lesion beyond moiety (See Article 2589 et seq.) are inapplicable to such conveyances which are made under authority of an admittedly valid statute.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.