Wall v. Close’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently December 2001 · most notably 779 So. 2d 704 - Naquin v. Titan Indem. Co. (2001), 802 So. 2d 598 - Sawicki v. K/S STAVANGER PRINCE (2001)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hardware Dealers' Mut Fire Ins Co of Wisconsin v. Glidden Co · State ex rel. Civello v. City of New Orleans · Gelfert v. National City Bank · Duffy v. City of New Orleans · State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In any case where any district court has granted any restraining order, preliminary injunction, permanent injunction, or other process which may restrain the execution or enforcement of any provision of the constitution or of any act, law or resolution of the legislature of Louisiana, the defendant or defendants or any person or persons affected thereby, may suspensively appeal the order or judgment to the court of competent appellate jurisdiction.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““The purpose of Act [No.] 15 of the 2nd E.S. of 1934 is to prevent the district courts from restraining the execution or enforcement of any provision of the Constitution or any act, law or resolution of the Legislature until it is declared invalid or unconstitutional by final decisions of the courts.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]o one has a vested right in any given mode of procedure.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.