Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 Md. 206 - Rizzo v. State

Rizzo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2006 · most notably Salsburg v. State of Maryland (1954), Farrow v. State (1964)

28 state decisions

90195219601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDonald v. United States · United States v. Jeffers · Smith v. State · Sugarman v. State · Lambert v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We are not infrequently reminded by counsel of our statement in Wood v. State, 185 Md. 280, 285 , 44 A.2d 859, 861 , that 'The Bouse Act and the Act of 1939 amount to adoption pro tanto of the Supreme Court decisions under the Fourth Amendment.’ The context shows that the extent .of pro tanto was the meaning of 'illegal search and seizure’ as dependent upon want of 'probable cause.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.