Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

201 Md. 651

92 A.2d 451

Docket [H.C. No. 17, October Term, 1952.]

Ridgeley v. Warden

RIDGELEY v. WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 11, 1952.

Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 2001-10-17

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-10-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2001

16 state decisions

802001decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before MARKELL, C.J., and DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, and HENDERSON, JJ.

¶2MARKELL, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

¶3This is an application for leave to appeal from denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is imprisoned under sentence for two years upon conviction by a trial magistrate of contributing to the delinquency of two children. He alleges that he was (1) denied the "opportunity" to secure counsel and refused "court-appointed" counsel and (2) refused the opportunity, and not given time, to secure witnesses. No circumstances are stated indicating a need for counsel, especially before a magistrate, or in what sense he was "refused" opportunity to secure witnesses.

¶4*652 Appointment of counsel by a magistrate is unheard of in Maryland, but as Judge Marbury stated in denying the writ, on appeal petitioner would have been entitled to a trial de novo; counsel could then have been appointed, if necessary. Petitioner's second complaint could also have been reviewed on appeal, but not on habeas corpus.

¶5Application denied, with costs.

/201/md/651 · .json · Public domain