¶1In addition to what is being said in the opinion of Justice Roberds overruling this suggestion of error, I desire to state that in my judgment the decree of the trial court on the issues involved as between the Gulf Refining Company and Wallace Harrison and others was erroneous, and should have been reversed for the further reason that the testimony showed almost conclusively that the vendor of Wallace Harrison and his co-defendants had actual notice of the existence of the Gulf Refining Company's lease at the time such vendor acquired his interest in the minerals in question.
201 Miss. 294
28 So.2d 221
Gulf Refining Co. v. Harrison
Decided December 9, 1946
Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1946-12-09
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1946-12-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1990
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →