Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 NJSUPER 181 - State v. Abbondanzo

State v. Abbondanzo’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Argersinger v. Hamlin · Von Moltke v. Gillies · United States v. Welty · Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATT · State v. Sugar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not cure the deficiency, since the second trial was de novo on the record — which precluded effective assistance of counsel at the prior critical stage of the proceedings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the judge must first advise a pro se defendant of such incarceration exposure before determining there has been an effective waiver of counsel. [Footnote omitted].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.