Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 201 OKLA 222 - Elam v. Loyd

Elam v. Loyd’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
August 1997
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 1997

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

120194919501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Champlin Refining Co. v. Cooper · Bunch v. Perkins · Sinclair Prairie Oil Co. v. Stell · Muzny v. Holland · Elam v. Beverly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘We have often said that questions of negligence and of contributory negligence are questions of fact for the jury and the court’s judgment thereon will not be disturbed on appeal where there is any competent evidence reasonably tending to support the same.’ Elam v. Loyd, 201 Okl. 222 , 204 P.2d 280, 281 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““We have long adhered to the rule that although the violation of a statute may be a negligent act, the violation does not constitute ‘actionable negligence’ unless the injury complained of is the proximate result thereof and the person injured is a member of the class intended to be protected by the statute and injury is of the kind statute intended to prevent. Sinclair Prairie Oil Company v. Stell, 190 Okl. 344 , 124 P.2d 255 ; Champlin Refining Company v. Cooper, 184 Okl. 153 , 86 P.2d 61 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.