201 Or. App. 261 - State v. Ferguson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The doctrine is generally applicable when a party has invited the trial court to rule in a particular way under circumstances that suggest that the party will be bound by the ruling[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The point of the [invited error] doctrine is to ensure that parties do not 'blame the court for their intentional or strategic trial choices that later prove unwise. ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.