State v. MC’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2020
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Watson · State v. Watson · In Re MB · 101 Wash. App. 425 - In re the Interest of M.B. · 107 Wash. App. 591 - State v. C.R.H.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]cknowledge that the report will be entered and used to support a finding of guilt and to impose a disposition if the juvenile fails to comply with terms of supervision;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. MOHAMOUD“[s]tipulate to the admissibility of the facts contained in the written police report;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. MOHAMOUD“An unambiguous statute is not subject to judicial construction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. SSY
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.